From the time I was a little girl I wanted to learn to draw. None of the schools I attended had an art program. In the 3rd and 4th grade we cut out shapes for the season--pumpkins for Halloween, Trees for Christmas, Bunnies for Easter. The windows in our classroom were divided, and each of our seasonal shapes filled one window.
I never really gave up on the idea of learning to draw, and on my own I learned a little. I also volunteered as a docent for an urban museum and learned a great deal from the training I received. I joined art organizations and learned more. I even took a few classes. I bought books and visited museums. I didn't give up.
Portrait from a photograph: Lyn Fenwick |
How silly of me. Recently I was watching television and learned about AI used to create art with Artificial Intelligence. What does that mean? It is the simulation of human intelligence using computers. Computers can be trained to think and act in the same way humans can.
These computers can learn, and the more it learns the better the output it can produce. If the computer has thousands of specific descriptions or images you have put into it, the more specific the result of what it can produce will be.
So, if you tell the computer you want a "picture of a little girl at the zoo" that is one level of description, but it you tell the computer you want a "picture of a little girl about 8 years old with blue eyes, freckles, and red hair pulled back into a pony tail, leaning on the wooden railing of the elephant pen," you are going to get a portrait much closer to the little girl you wanted to create, assuming you have "taught" the computer by entering all the information it needs to complete your description of the girl.
Copyright: Lyn Fenwick |
The question remains, are you an artist? Did you create the picture of the little girl?
Another question might be, does it make any difference how it was created if the end result is a satisfactory portrait of the little girl you set out to draw?
But, perhaps the next question should be will you experience the same satisfaction by creating the portrait with AI as you would have by using your own hands and shaping and coloring to complete the image? Is there something missing in an AI portrait that can't be exactly explained but has failed to capture the indescribable spark that art requires?
Is going for a drive in the country the same if your hands are not on the wheel? Is the pride of training and practicing and sacrificing to improve as rewarding if everyone who entered the race gets a trophy?
We human beings should be asking these questions.
2 comments:
I’ve been thinking about this topic a lot with all of the recent news reports on AI art. I wonder to what extent the answer partially lies in whether you enjoy art as a traditional artist/producer, as one who appreciates the process, techniques and craft, or as a person who just wants something interesting on the walls?
Computer generated text is creating great problems for university professors, including my daughter, who dealt with enough plagiarism and out right cheating before. Now the term papers and take home exams require a great deal of work both in assigning and in marking.
Computer generated art is stealing from artists work to create a basis for its output.
Post a Comment