Is Truth a Big Deal?

 I hope that most people would agree that truth is a Big Deal.  Over the years I have blogged about the significance of telling the truth, from little white fibs to avoid hurting someone's feelings to absolute whoppers, whether for relatively insignificant boasts to harmful lies.  This post is about something else.  The question in this blog deals with Lies verses Omissions.  Can it be just as harmful to omit the full truth as it is to outright lie.

I do a great deal of research for writing my blog posts, and because history is often the subject of my blogs, I often seek a broad range of sources in an effort not to be misled.  To answer the question of my title, Yes, Truth is a Big Deal to me, and lying by omission deliberately by leaving out important details so that the truth is skewed by misrepresentation is one of the most disgusting means.  

My husband and I have always been curious to learn more, and the fact that our careers took us to many places, we delighted in visiting many sources of learning, from museums to restaurants, music, lectures, and many other things, but especially important were National Parks.  

Therefore, I was especially disturbed to learn that Museums and Parks are altering the content of information in these public places to "to promote a more patriotic description of American History."  First of all, promoting "a more patriotic version" isn't history.  History is defined as "a chronological record of significant events, including an explanation of their causes."  History is truth, and microprinting by omitting part of the story isn't history.

Museums and parks across the Nation have been impacted by such directives, and in Kansas the directive has impacted the narrative of Brown v. Board of Education.  Such examples as The Grand Canyon "history" that omitted the settlers pushing tribes off the land they had occupied for generations, as well as the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument that omitted information about global warming's impact on the cacti were not being patriotic.  Both of those examples are half-truths, with a very different purpose than patriotism.    

And so, I return to the question whether truth matters.  Olin Vevi, Library of Congress, quoted Francisco Goya:  The sleep of reason produces monsters."  Retired Professor Crispin Sartwell began his paper, "Truth is Real" with these words:  "It is often said, rather casually, that truth is dissolving, that we live in the 'post-truth era."  But truth is one of our central concepts -- perhaps our most central concept --  and I don't think we can do without it."            

Do Lies Matter?

 I have written about lying in this blog in the past, but the common acceptance of it continues to trouble me.  A study at the University of Massachusetts found that 60% of people cannot go 10 minutes without lying at least once.  A study at the University of Virginia found that people are more likely to lie over the phone than in person, and another study found people were more likely to lie to strangers.  The list of reasons range from protecting themselves or others, gaining social acceptance, avoiding the consequences of illegal or disreputable activity, and to gain an advantage, to maintain privacy, and to avoid looking foolish or ignorant.  

The studies I read did not seem to include internet lying.  If people are more likely to lie over the telephone than in person, I would assume than lying on the internet is even more common.  Some of the reasons seem more understandable than others, but from my perspective, the acceptance of lying is disheartening.  Many famous people have expressed their concerns and disapproval about lying.  However, as I share some of their comments, you will notice that many of those I quote are long dead!  Do modern commentators find lying less disreputable? 

Here are some thought provoking quotes:

He who tells a lie is not sensible to how great a task he undertakes, for he must be forced to invent twenty more to maintain that one. Alexander Pope, 1688-1744, English Poet and Translator. 

Tricks and treachery are the practice of fools, that don't have brains enough to be honest.  Benjamin Franklin, 1706-1790, writer, scientist, inventor, statesman, diplomate, printer, publisher and political philosopher.

It is discouraging how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit.  Noel Coward, 1899-1973, English Playwright, composer, director, actor, singer.

The cruelest lies are often told in silence.  Robert Lewis Stevenson, 1859-1894, Novelist essayist, poet, and travel writer.

I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you.  Friedrich Nietzsche, 1844-1900, German Philosopher, prose poet, critic, philologist, and composer.

A good liar knows that the most effective lie is always a truth that has had a key piece removed from it.  Carlos Ruiz Aafon, Spanish Novelist, 1964-2020, and author of one of my favorite books, The Shadow of the Wind.

And, continuing with two living authors, I don't like lies...even lies of omission.  Hard truths can be delt with, triumphed over, but lies will destroy your soul.  Patricia Briggs, American author of fantasy.

The trust of the innocent is the liar's most useful tool.  Stephen King, American author of Supernatural fiction, suspense, and crime.

I believe lies do matter, and I fear that the disrespect for truthfulness is a threat to the Nation.  George Washington was known for his firm moral conscience.  His leadership as our first President was very important to the young nation and what he helped shape in those first years.  For 200 years, he was known for his honesty as a little boy for admitting to his father that he was the one who cut down the cherry tree.  That story of a little boy who 'could not tell a lie' became a part of what was expected for our leadership and for its citizens.  

The irony is that an itinerate minister named Mason Locke Weems, set out to make Washington a role model for young men by mythologizing young Washington's life.  For over 200 years, the story of chopping down the cherry tree was taken as fact.  The myth that Weems created almost certainly would have displeased Washington, whose integrity should have given Weems many accurate examples to describe Washington's honesty and sense of responsibility, rather than inventing a false story.    

 I believe neglect of telling the truth matters, and I have chosen to share the words quoted above to express my feelings about that importance.  Our justice system depends on people willing to tell the truth.  Those we elect to office are expected to honor the oath of office they have taken.  Contracts mean nothing if those who enter into them have no intention of honoring what they have contracted to do. Reflecting on whether lies matter seems important to me.    

Isaac's Embarrassment

In order to acquire title to a homestead, it was necessary for the homesteader, after staking a claim, living on the land, and making the required improvements, to go before a judge and swear that he or she had lived on the claim and fulfilled the requirements for the mandated period of time.  In addition, he or she had to swear that their intention was to remain on their claim.  The objective of offering free land was to populate the vast open territory in the West, and the requirements were intended to prohibit speculators from claiming land they never intended to occupy, and discouraging those who only claimed a homestead in order to sell it.  Not only were the homesteaders themselves required to swear to these requirements but also they were to bring witnesses.

Isaac Werner was asked by several neighbors to go with them to appear before the judge, under oath, and swear that he had knowledge that the homesteader had fulfilled the requirements.  One of the neighbors for whom Isaac appeared had met all of the requirements of living on and improving his claim for the required time, but he had also made a deal to dispose of the land in a horse swap before having proved up his claim.  Isaac knew nothing about the horse deal when he agreed to appear as a witness for his friend.  When a U.S. Marshal arrested Isaac's friend for lying under oath about having not sold the land before proving it up, Isaac felt, rightfully so, that he had been taken advantage of by a friend.

Photo Credit:  Lyn Fenwick

American laws and traditions place great emphasis on the importance of oaths.  In the case of Isaac and his friend, both men raised their hands and swore to tell the truth and the whole truth.  One lied and the other supported that lie because his oath was based on his honest belief that his friend had met the homestead requirements.  Isaac did not know about the horse deal, and he swore to the truth as he knew it.

I confess.  I have very little patience with or respect for a liar.  Yet, nailing down the "truth" is sometimes not quite a simple thing.  The best simple definition I found for truth is 'that which is in accordance with fact or reality.' 

However, a more serious search for a definition leads to Philosophers' definitions and Religious definitions, as well as many specific theories.  Correspondence theories emphasize truth as corresponding to the actual state of affairs.  Coherence theories require fitting the elements within a whole system.  Pragmatic theory holds that truth is verified and confirmed by the results of putting concepts into practice.  Consensus relies on a definition of truth as that which is agreed upon by a group.

As those who follow this blog already know, I often turn to Mark Twain for common sense definitions, and he seems to have addressed lies more frequently than truth, but here are two of his tongue-in-cheek observations.  Truth is the most valuable thing we have.  Let us economize it, Twain suggested.  Elaborating a bit on that theme, he wrote, Familiarity breeds contempt.  How accurate that is.  The reason we hold truth in such respect is because we have so little opportunity to get familiar with it.  Sometimes his humor takes a second to catch his point! 

Recent news has involved the decision by the Justice Department to drop the criminal case against Michael Flynn despite his having admitted twice in court that he had lied under oath.  When an interviewer asked Attorney General Barr, who signed off on the decision to drop the criminal case, "When history looks back on this decision, how do you think it will be written?" Barr replied, "Well, history is written by the winner.  So, it largely depends on whose writing the history..."

Credit:  Portrait Artist Susan B. Durkee

I have written before in this blog about that particular saying, and it is certainly true that those in authority do present history to a present audience in a way favorable to them.  The fact that future authorities may present history in a light favorable to them does not determine how those in the present should evaluate truth vs. lies.

Again, I turn to Mark Twain for guidance, and he has clearly addressed the point. Anybody can tell lies: there is no merit in a mere lie, it must possess art, it must exhibit a splendid & plausible & convincing probability; that is to say, it must be powerfully calculated to deceive.  

Isaac Werner lived in a time when everyone knew their neighbors, yet he managed to be embarrassed by a friend, who put him in the position to support that friend's proof of claim by concealing from Isaac the horse trade.  Today we have so many more resources to evaluate truth; yet, we seem to find it more and more difficult for everyone to agree what truth is.  In closing, I will suggest that sometimes we make things too complicated when the truth is as simple as the definition with which I began--"that which is in accordance with fact or reality."